FORMS OF LIFE AND LANDSCAPES OF CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2016-1-1-38-67Keywords:
totemism, anthropology, form of life, form of culture, symbolic form, cultural landscapeAbstract
The author considers a complex system of man-landscape relationship as a starting point of worldview formation and a primary condition for the development of cultural traditions. This basic level of social and environmental organization is presented as a space-technological and adaptiv e environmental system, which is constructed by the relations of man with the landscape and by a set of external world objects that are vitally important and culturally significant for human existence. The main function of culture is adaptive, whereas the landscape plays an active role in designing human world, i. e. in acquiring basic economic skills, technology development, and related programs and life strategies. The author believes that the historically accurate models of culture embody typologically different forms of social landscape and organize spatiotemporally the local ‘life-worlds’”; for instance, the classic landscape embraces the space of “the lack of the Other”. The author focuses on the genesis of the agrarian cultural tradition, and considers the relationship of two discourses — existential-phenomenological philosophy and philosophical anthropology. The article follows the general evolution of the classical anthropology with the distinction of dzōon (living being) and bios (life form), which led to the problematization of “symbolic forms” (E. Cassirer).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-01-15
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Сергей Д.Д. FORMS OF LIFE AND LANDSCAPES OF CULTURE // Russian Peasant Studies. 2016. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 38–67. https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2016-1-1-38-67