Suburbs of Ulan-Ude: Practices of citizenship and the “right to the city”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2024-9-1-75-95Keywords:
rural migration, right to the city, russia, Ulan-Ude, suburbs, citizenship, territorial public self-governmentAbstract
The author shows how local residents of the closest suburbs of Ulan-Ude (which grew rapidly in the 2000s - 2010s due to detached houses construction, including dacha non-commercial partnerships (DNP) without basic engineering, housing and social infrastructure) defended their “right to the city” (comfortable environment in suburban residential areas, equal access to urban public goods, etc.). The struggle for this right implied social-political mobilization, awareness and acceptance of personal responsibility for the development of territories, including in the form of territorial public self-government (TPS) that widely developed in Buryatia in the 2010s. However, this struggle was not widespread, all-encompassing, constant and sustainable as local suburban communities remained disunited and united only to solve common problems. The case of Ulan-Ude and its suburbs shows the situational nature of urban citizenship and the continuing fragmentation of urban and suburban communities in their seemingly common strive for the adequate quality of the urban/suburban environment, equal access to public goods and urban resources. The article shows a variety of argumentations for the “right to the city’, which may directly contradict each other, since the ideals embodied in this right often are not perceived by ‘ordinary’ residents. The study is based on the author’s participant observations (from 2011), in-depth interviews with leaders and activists of TPS and DNP in the suburban settlements of Ulan-Ude (2021- 2024), a focus group (January 2024) and media publications.References
Базаров Б. В., Балдано М. Н. и др. (ред.). (2016). Улан-Удэ: 350 лет: история и современность. В 2 т. Том второй: XX-XXI вв. Иркутск: Оттиск.
Бреславский А. С. (2014). Незапланированные пригороды: сельско-городская миграция и рост Улан-Удэ в постсоветский период. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во БНЦ СО РАН.
Бреславский А. С. (2017). "Пригородная революция" в региональном срезе (Улан- Удэ) // Крестьяноведение. Т. 2. № 1. С. 90-101.
Бреславский А. С., Скворцова Ю. П. (2021). Территориальное общественное самоуправление в Республике Бурятия: опыт реализации гражданских инициатив в 2010-е гг. Иркутск: Оттиск.
Бреславский А. С. (2023). Динамика и типы демографического развития "городских агломераций" ДФО РФ в 1990-2010-е гг. // Ойкумена. № 4. С. 23-35.
Карбаинов Н. И. (2005). "Нахаловки" Улан-Удэ: гражданское общество на взлетной полосе // Отечественные записки. № 6. С. 192-197.
Карбаинов Н. И. (2007). "Нахаловки" Улан-Удэ: "огораживание" пригородной земли // Социологические исследования. № 11(283). С. 136-140.
Blokland T., Hentschel C., Holm A., Lebuhn H., Margalit T. (2015). Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 39. № 4. P. 655-665.
Harvey D. (2006). "The Right to the City" // Divided Cities: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 83-103.
Holston J., Caldeira T. (2008). Urban peripheries and the invention of citizenship // Harvard Design Magazine, Spring/Summer. P. 17-23.
Lefebvre H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city // City. Vol. 13. № 2-3. P. 185-197.
Mayer M. (2009). The ‘Right to the City' in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements // City. Vol. 13. № 2-3. P. 362-374.
Merrifield A. (2011). The right to the city and beyond // City. Vol. 15. № 3-4. P. 473-481.
Rose N. (1996). The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government // Economy and Society. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 327-356.