Management models of the northern Russian village in the post-perestroika period

Authors

  • Maryana N. Arkhipova Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Lomonosov Moscow State University Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-3-129-143

Keywords:

north of european Russia, nostalgia, gender, managers, power, mutual assistance, collectivism, perestroika, 'transit'

Abstract

The article considers the management practices of the North-European Russian villagers in the post-perestroika period. Based on the field data, the author examines the practices of the heads of rural administrations in one district of the Arkhangelsk Region. The main field method were ethnographic interviews with villagers of the Arkhangelsk Region, who used to hold or has held leadership positions in rural administrations. The study shows that many villagers remember the Soviet past with nostalgia, which is explained by its special qualities - ‘stability’, ‘collectivism’, ‘mutual assistance’, ‘confidence in the future’. The author argues that there is some correlation between gender and chosen management models: as a rule, women emphasize the principles of collectivism and mutual assistance, focus on helping the most vulnerable groups in their villages (unemployed, single mothers, etc.); while men prefer administrative resources and personal connections, often ignoring the needs of their fellow villagers. The study showed that in the post-Soviet village, there was a kind of symbiosis of several management models with clear gender differences in their application.

References

Агапов М. В., Клюева В. П. (2018). "Север зовет!": мотив "северное притяжение" в истории освоения российской Арктики // Сибирские исторические исследования. № 4. С. 6-24.

Матонин В. Н. (2013). Локальное и универсальное в социокультурном пространстве Поонежья и Онежского Поморья // Вестник СВФУ им. М. К. Аммосова. Т. 10. № 1. C. 48-54.

Пименов В. В. (1967). О некоторых закономерностях в развитии народной культуры // Советская этнография. № 2. С. 3-14.

Репина Л. П. (2000). Пол, власть и концепция "разделенных сфер": от истории женщин к гендерной истории // Общественные науки и современность. № 4. С. 123-137.

Тихоницкая Н. Н.(1934). Сельскохозяйственная толока у русских // Советская этнография. № 4. С. 73-90.

Alberto A., Fuchs-Schündeln N. (2005). Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of Communism on people's preferences // American Economic Review. Vol. 97. № 4. P. 1507-1528.

Bach J. (2002). "The taste remains": Consumption, (n)ostalgia, and the production of East Germany // Public Culture. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 545-566.

Bloch A. (2000). Authenticating tradition: Material culture, youth, and belonging in central Siberia // Museum Anthropology. № 23(3). P. 42-57.

Buyandelgeriyn M. (2008). Post-post-transition theories: Walking on multiple paths // Annual Review of Anthropology. P. 235-250.

Bridenthal R., Koonz C., Stuard S. M., (eds.) (1987). Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Heyat F. (2002). Women and the culture of entrepreneurship in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan // Markets and Moralities. London: Routledge P. 19-31.

Kharkhordin O., Gerber T. (1994).Russian directors' business ethic: A study of industrial enterprises in St Petersburg, 1993 // Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 46. P. 1075-1107.

True J. (2003). Gender, Globalization, and Postsocialism: The Chech Republic after Communism. Columbia: University Press.

Velikonja M. (2002). Ex-Home: Balkan Culture in Slovenia after 1991 // The Balkans in Focus: Cultural Boundaries in Europe / eds. B. Törnquist-Plewa, S. Resic. Sweden: Lund. P. 189-207.

Velikonja M. (2009). Lost in transition: Nostalgia for socialism in post-socialist countries // East European: Politics and Societies. Vol. 23. № 4. P. 535-551.

Verdery K. (1991). Theorizing socialism: A prologue to the "tranzition" // American Ethnologist. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 419-439.

Published

2023-01-01